Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:20

Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Buying Guide: The Best Watches For Life During Summer 2025 - Monochrome Watches
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Do Flat Earthers exist today? If so, where do they live?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
How the Brain Filters Distractions to Stay Focused on a Goal - Neuroscience News
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Protester shot and killed at ‘No Kings’ rally in Utah, police say - AP News
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Phillies Place Bryce Harper On 10-Day IL Due To Wrist Inflammation - MLB Trade Rumors
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Ten things to know about veganism in childhood - BBC
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Flipping two atoms in LSD turned it into a powerful treatment for damaged brain circuits - PsyPost